Site Tools


en:tech:laser

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
en:tech:laser [2020/10/15 17:41] – created bullaren:tech:laser [2022/09/25 08:49] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 3: Line 3:
 The original article you will find [[http://redmine.laoslaser.org/projects/laos/wiki/Moshi-to-laos-conversion-SH-K40-1V|here]] The original article you will find [[http://redmine.laoslaser.org/projects/laos/wiki/Moshi-to-laos-conversion-SH-K40-1V|here]]
  
-I bought my Chinese Laser Cutter from a German vendor in 2014 in order get a Laser Class 1 system. A Class 1 laser is safe under all conditions of normal use. No need for any eye protection which increases the WAF (wife acceptance factor).+I bought my Chinese Laser Cutter from a German vendor in 2014 in order get a Laser Class 1 system. A Class 1 laser is safe under all conditions of normal use. No need for any eye protection which increases the PAF (partner acceptance factor).
 After some trials I faced the common issue with MoshiDraw and the corresponding controller (MS10105 V4.5). One of the severe drawbacks of V4.5 is the missing link between controller board and laser power control. The laser power has to be set manually for each job. After some trials I faced the common issue with MoshiDraw and the corresponding controller (MS10105 V4.5). One of the severe drawbacks of V4.5 is the missing link between controller board and laser power control. The laser power has to be set manually for each job.
 The next versions of the controller (V4.6) solves this bottleneck but it's still a closed system. And the Chinese MoshiDraw software is ugly...  The next versions of the controller (V4.6) solves this bottleneck but it's still a closed system. And the Chinese MoshiDraw software is ugly... 
en/tech/laser.1602783662.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/10/15 18:41 (external edit)