Site Tools


en:tech:dabmodule

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
en:tech:dabmodule [2022/09/26 09:57] – external edit 127.0.0.1en:tech:dabmodule [2022/11/10 20:53] – [Hardware] bullar
Line 67: Line 67:
 The PCB always looks more benign after routing than during the design process. For a better representation in the following picture without filled ground areas: The PCB always looks more benign after routing than during the design process. For a better representation in the following picture without filled ground areas:
  
-{{ :tech:dab_module_brd.png?direct&400 |DAB+ module PCB}}+{{:tech:dab_module_sch.png?direct&400|DAB+ module schematic}} 
 +{{:tech:dab_module_brd.png?direct&400|DAB+ module PCB}}
  
 In order for the selected SMA socket to fit, the PCB should only be produced 1.0mm thick. With 29x18mm, the module looks quite handy. Produced by [[https://jlcpcb.com|JLCPCB]] it costs a little more than usual because I used //Castellated Holes// so half holes for the module connections. I definitely recommend ordering a stencil, otherwise it will be even more fun when you paste it. Here is the 'paste' result with stencil: In order for the selected SMA socket to fit, the PCB should only be produced 1.0mm thick. With 29x18mm, the module looks quite handy. Produced by [[https://jlcpcb.com|JLCPCB]] it costs a little more than usual because I used //Castellated Holes// so half holes for the module connections. I definitely recommend ordering a stencil, otherwise it will be even more fun when you paste it. Here is the 'paste' result with stencil:
en/tech/dabmodule.txt · Last modified: 2022/11/10 20:56 by bullar